<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aurelien's weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aurel32.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aurel32.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Performances of open-source Radeon driver by aurel32</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/94#comment-2264</link>
		<dc:creator>aurel32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=94#comment-2264</guid>
		<description>dynpm actually does change the GPU frequencies, at least according to /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/radeon_pm_info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dynpm actually does change the GPU frequencies, at least according to /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/radeon_pm_info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Performances of open-source Radeon driver by paulez</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/94#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>paulez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=94#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>dypm is not the best solution in term of power consumption, because it changes only mem frequencies, the gpu one is the same as on high power profile.
So with low settings you will have less power consumption because gpu will be down-clocked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dypm is not the best solution in term of power consumption, because it changes only mem frequencies, the gpu one is the same as on high power profile.<br />
So with low settings you will have less power consumption because gpu will be down-clocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Performances of open-source Radeon driver by aurel32</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/94#comment-2261</link>
		<dc:creator>aurel32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 06:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=94#comment-2261</guid>
		<description>Yes i tried all the possible values in syfs, i only mentioned the one that is supposed to get the best results. I also looked at the list of opened bug reports, but I haven&#039;t tried yet to open a new one or ask on IRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i tried all the possible values in syfs, i only mentioned the one that is supposed to get the best results. I also looked at the list of opened bug reports, but I haven&#8217;t tried yet to open a new one or ask on IRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Performances of open-source Radeon driver by Chrisbee</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/94#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrisbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=94#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got an Acer Aspire 1 522 with the AMD fusion C50 chipset and I get ~6 hours autonomy on a bog standard Lubuntu 04-11 install. It&#039;s got a 6 cell battery.
Why not Debian?  Squeeze comes up with 800 x 600 display resolution which sucks on a native 1280 x 720 display. Wheezy barfs during the install at the detect hard disks and partitions for some reason.
I&#039;m just a timid tinderer so don&#039;t have the skills and confidence to poke further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got an Acer Aspire 1 522 with the AMD fusion C50 chipset and I get ~6 hours autonomy on a bog standard Lubuntu 04-11 install. It&#8217;s got a 6 cell battery.<br />
Why not Debian?  Squeeze comes up with 800 x 600 display resolution which sucks on a native 1280 x 720 display. Wheezy barfs during the install at the detect hard disks and partitions for some reason.<br />
I&#8217;m just a timid tinderer so don&#8217;t have the skills and confidence to poke further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Performances of open-source Radeon driver by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/94#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=94#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>Just to check the obvious things: did you try setting power_method to low in sysfs? And have you tried asking on #radeon on freenode or https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI&amp;component=DRM/Radeon for advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to check the obvious things: did you try setting power_method to low in sysfs? And have you tried asking on #radeon on freenode or <a href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI&#038;component=DRM/Radeon">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI&#038;component=DRM/Radeon</a> for advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) by Linux Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dvě nové architektury v Debianu: armhf a s390x</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/59#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dvě nové architektury v Debianu: armhf a s390x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=59#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>[...] Debianu pro mainframe s390. Nedávno o něm na svém blogu psal Aurélien Jarno, který je také za jeho vývoj zodpovědný. Důvod vzniku je jednoduché: Klasický port Debianu pro s390 využívá jen 31bitovou adresaci [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debianu pro mainframe s390. Nedávno o něm na svém blogu psal Aurélien Jarno, který je také za jeho vývoj zodpovědný. Důvod vzniku je jednoduché: Klasický port Debianu pro s390 využívá jen 31bitovou adresaci [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) by Dvě nové architektury v Debianu: armhf a s390x (Debian-linux.cz)</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/59#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Dvě nové architektury v Debianu: armhf a s390x (Debian-linux.cz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=59#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>[...] Debianu pro mainframe s390. Nedávno o něm na svém blogu psal Aurélien Jarno, který je také za jeho vývoj zodpovědný. Důvod vzniku je jednoduché: Klasický port Debianu pro s390 využívá jen 31bitovou adresaci [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debianu pro mainframe s390. Nedávno o něm na svém blogu psal Aurélien Jarno, který je také za jeho vývoj zodpovědný. Důvod vzniku je jednoduché: Klasický port Debianu pro s390 využívá jen 31bitovou adresaci [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) by &#187; DPN n.12/2011 Debianizzati.Org</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/59#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; DPN n.12/2011 Debianizzati.Org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=59#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) by Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) « Aurelien&#039;s weblog &#124; Linux Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/59#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) « Aurelien&#039;s weblog &#124; Linux Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=59#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>[...] the SPARC64 port, as some of the issues are the &#8230;      Read more from the original source: Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) « Aurelien&#039;s weblog   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged debconf, during-debconf, fast-s390, goal, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the SPARC64 port, as some of the issues are the &#8230;      Read more from the original source: Debian s390x port (aka 31 bits is not enough) « Aurelien&#039;s weblog   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged debconf, during-debconf, fast-s390, goal, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debian QEMU images updated by Thomas Lynema&#039;s Weblog &#183; Moving from XEN to KVM</title>
		<link>http://blog.aurel32.net/46#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lynema&#039;s Weblog &#183; Moving from XEN to KVM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=46#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

